[1521] French and Comuneros {interview}
Francisco Iglesias Carreño
ML members [Movement Leon] meeting today days 9-4 - 2011 in the city of León de Salamanca, echoing the protests of citizens Iglesias Carreño (D. Francis), on the events in 1521 in the Iberian Peninsula, have called for a friendly meeting and in any case brotherly Helmántico in the city so that we clarify their views on the mentioned events. Posts
this, from the Movement Leon ML, we asked:
P. How important is the year 1521 for Spain? .
R. It happens that the really important happened in 1521, is relegated to oblivion in a way that is, we estimate, and not coincidentally, when its importance and its high should be relevant, call it in modern terms, the real newsworthy event.
Q. But not everything has been said already about the year 1521? .
R. It has been said is true, but we add, from our side has not been weighted in their full terms, even he has been dispossessed of their real historical magnitude, giving a shelve (acadecimiscista maybe?) That is negating such time and in such situation.
P. How can these acts of 1521 frames?
. R. We're in 1521 here in the state of a situation of government, that is, at the time, a sum of several Coronas [which, broadly speaking, we place as the Crown Leonesa Aragonese and Castilian Crown], where, since 1917, we have a young king who is being subjected to severe political tensions and war, and among those caused by Henry II of Navarre and his protector / ally Francis I of France.
P. "... Henry II of Navarre? .
R. If, in 1917 death of his mother Catherine de Foix and Henry II accedes to the trope, but doing so is to recover all the Crown Navarra, for military action -.- after the Bulls of Pope Julius II against the House of Albert ( the first was the Pastor Caelestis Ille-in that bull was excommunicated in general terms to the allies of the French king., and the second bull, the exigent Contumacium, the house was stripped Albert of the Crown and Navarre released his subjects, which were isolated from the oath of allegiance to their sovereign, in practice the Crown policy Navarra who remained at the mercy of the annexation or intended first.) - Fernando the Catholic (from the Aragonese and married Germaine de Foix), is incorporated into their domains, so arto curious, go to the Castilian Crown and the Crown in 1512 Leon ..
P. Is that why it is important and as you said, also important?
R. Henry II that is to group all the old Crown Navarra and it starts talks with Carlos I. Such conversations take place in Noyon (in 1516) and then in Montpellier (1518), but not come to fruition in agreement.
P. And what can guess from this? .
R. Well, the failure of negotiations between Henry II and Charles I, drives the first to change its strategy and move the negotiations to other policy areas, and always with the same purpose and that purpose provides an entente with Francis I in France it has with Carlos I hegemonic rivalry in Europe at that time.
P. What do Henry II and Francis I? .
R. Begin preparations to take by force of arms the geographical area of \u200b\u200bthe Corona de Navarra. And design a plan of attack against Navarre fittings Carlos I, while who stir up a popular uprising against the troops of the Crown and the Crown Leonesa Castellana that are highlighted in such places. We are facing a Crown as the Crown Navarre, conquered / integrated by the Aragonese and "delivered", ignore the proceedings, the Crown and the Crown Castellana Leon, where they are already embedded in the Castilian Crown, since 1200, Basque demarcations: Alava, Vizcaya and Guipuzcoa. These decisions of Francis I of France did not give to see, in our view, far from the events of 4/22/1520 (Cortes de la Castellana and the Crown Crown Leon in La Coruña) and 28.06.1520 (choice as Emperor Charles I) and, of course, on 23/10/1520 (Coronation of Charles I as Emperor)
P. Well this is not widely publicized! .
R. All the more reason to ponder now is important, for me, high importance, since it takes place in 1521, and is happening, and it looks and finds that facts may be collateral superlativícen that time, interest mediate and short-term political-that are uninformed-rather than those who, in our opinion particular, are major and really important.
Q. result is reached in Navarra attack the alliance of Henry II and Francis I against Charles I?
. R. Of course there are attempts, after the death of Fernando II the Catholic, in 1516 (in March), that does not succeed, by the reaction of the regency of Cardinal Cisneros. For later in the año1521, Navarro-Gascon army, sent by Henry II, enter the Crown Navarra and, aided by an uprising of the inhabitants, causing the initial victory of Francis I and his ally. On May 19, 1521 capitulation occurs Pamplona, \u200b\u200band before May 15 San Juan de Pied de Port, Roncesvalles and then Burguete. As Olite, Sanguesa and Tudela.
Q. That is no longer around Navarre? .
. R-certainly is, but this, except to the Crown Navarra and the Basque Provinces, and the upper valley Ebro, just seems to be driven by researchers and scholars, and reiterate that we are in 1521. , And an army Gascon-Navarro, who is operating within the crown of Navarra in early May, has not formed a "pis pas", but it has been prepared in advance, and therefore, everyone can which has been venturing into this period of preparation which has also been the spark threshold after this start, which would take us, unequivocally, to a temporary-.- for the preparation of quartermaster troops of Francis I and Henry II -.- the first quarter of 1521 and even long before. So in this period, could be the start of the year last quarter 1520, has decided to Francis I of France (in its true or alleged sponsorship of Henry II) to attack Carlos I would say that "the Crown Navarra" or "through Navarra Crown."
Q. Why Francis I of Navarre attacks in 1521? .
R. Why is the right time, the most strategic place to do it and the optimal chance to achieve their goals and also against what seems a share of Henry II, in fact their presence is, in the absence (as there is with the armies) of total subordination, and the proof is that the French military onslaught, taking the crown in Navarra, not there and go to the city of Logroño (as in the Castilian Crown), which besiege. P
. What does the meantime the rest of Europe at that time?. . R. What we have said before needs a preamble, a necessary preamble, and that Francis I of France (the alleged / allegedly wants to help Henry II), you need the quiet war of their other border areas, and it puts all its intention to make a political approach of Henry VIII of England [trying to break the Treaty of Canterbury established between Charles I and Henry VIII, perhaps instigated by Queen Catherine] and therefore urges the conference gastronomic / pastoral / Policy Field of the Cloth Gold (quote you get from the meeting, two weeks, the Field of Cloth of Gold meeting being held in 1520 - maybe on the month of June at the place setting of meadows and Ardres located between Guînes near of the population of Calais under English rule at the time-to address: both an agreement to end hostilities between their kingdoms, and, yet, to conclude an alliance to stop the advance of Spain, governed by the future Emperor Charles V) P
. And how is that such and such important events of 1520 and 1521 we have ceased to be reported here?.
R. It may be that here, for various reasons, want to talk about germanías and communities and such stories give a sense of autochthonous proposed placing them to do so outside the European scene of the confrontations, when it is not so, because their relationship seems to be evident. The information / intelligence to the start of the modern age of both Francis I and Charles I are aware of the situations occurring in their respective domains, and therefore the matches at the time of the surveys / pronouncements against Charles I can not, in principle, be separated from other interferences that are foreign. It is no accident that, on the plateau north of the Iberian Peninsula, two armies to move, and at the same time!, Against Charles I.
P. " There were agreements between the rebels against Charles I and the armies of Francis I?
R. There have been a relationship of concomitant conditions of both, which are detailed in:
(1 °) In early 1521, but Laso de la Vega did not report that a French spy had spent 15 days in Valladolid (instigating neutrality Board Comunera before the invasion of Navarra).?;
(2) Comte de Nájera not reported talks between the French and commoners (produced for the month of March)?;
(3rd) Duke of Alba, in a letter to Queen Catherine, does not indicate the stoking of the Communities by Francis I to stand against Carlos I and go to, invading Navarre and besieging the city, with help of the community?
(4 º) Does the work of D M. Fernández described the conviction of Charles I by collusion between Francis I and the community?
(5 º) documents Esparra not confirm the entente between the French Crown and the community?
(6 °) The three spies arrested in the Basque Country are not proof of agreement with the French Crown Communities?;
(7 º) ...
P. Well if it seems that the year 1521 was very important in the Iberian Peninsula
R. Extremely important, as the 1520 and 1522, because, in short, mean behavior of Hispania / Spain in the Modern Age, from a new interior design to an external action, and how from the beginning of foreign interventionism (the flamingos) becomes a share that every time it may be more Hispanic indigenous peoples. What
signed by the ML, in the city of León de Salamanca, April 9, 2011
:
GRES (Rafael D. Núñez) -.- CC.ZZ (Jose Miguel T. Barrios) -.- GAPLAN (Miguel Angel F. García)
0 comments:
Post a Comment